Best Women's Trail Running Shorts of 2026
The Most Comfortable Running Shorts for Women, With Compression, Pockets, and Curvy Fits
September 18th, 2026, updated with 11 new pairs of shorts
Home > Gear Reviews > Apparel
Once you start running more frequently, the right pair of shorts makes a real difference. The gap between a pair that chafes by mile three and one you forget you're wearing usually comes down to a handful of specifics: a liner that doesn't bunch, a waistband that stays put without digging in, and pockets that actually hold a phone securely rather than just looking like they could.
We spent three years testing women's trail running shorts across the Colorado mountains on dirt trails, high-altitude roads, and a wide range of conditions, with testers including marathoners and daily runners logging hundreds of miles in 15 of the most promising pairs. Every pair was worn year-round, during long training runs and casual jogs, to assess fit, comfort, and durability over time rather than just on a single run.
What separates a genuinely good trail running short from one that ends up at the back of a drawer comes down to how breathable the fabric is under sustained effort, whether the liner actually prevents chafing without bunching, how securely the waistband stays up without a constant tug, and whether the pockets hold their contents through technical terrain rather than just road miles.
Top Pick: The Patagonia Strider Pro earns our Best Overall award. It stood out for its ideal blend of lightweight feel, a secure waistband that doesn't require adjustment mid-run, and a functional pocket layout with one zip pocket and two side stash pockets that handle everything from gels to a some phones. It's also the overall winner for Best Men's Running Shorts, making it one of the few products on Treeline Review to earn awards across both guides.
We create reader-supported, objective gear reviews independently selected by our editors. This story may contain affiliate links, which help fund our website. When you click on the links to purchase gear, we may get a commission, without costing you an extra cent. Thank you for supporting our work and mission of outdoor coverage for every body! Learn more.
Comparison Table
| TRAIL RUNNING SHORTS | TREELINE AWARD | SIZES | LENGTHS | LINER | RISE | COMPRESSION | POCKETS | REFLECTIVE? | MSRP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patagonia Strider Pro Shorts | Best overall Read why |
XXS-XL | 3.5" | ✅ | Mid | ❌ | 5 | ✅ | $85 |
| Janji Pace Short | Best for long runs Read why |
XXS-XXXL | 5, 7" | ❌ | High | Mid to high | 4 | ✅ | $74, 78 |
| REI Co-op Swiftland Running Shorts | Best for hot and dusty Read why |
XS-XXXL | 3, 5, 6" | ✅ | Mid or high | 2-in-1 does | 4-5 | ✅ | $60-65 |
| Patagonia Maipo Shorts | Best for steep climbs Read why |
XXS-XXL | 8" | ❌ | High | Light | 2 | ❌ | $75 |
| rabbit Leggy Smashems | Best with phone pocket Read why |
XS-XL | 5, 7" | ❌ | Mid | High | 6 | ✅ | $70 |
For more of our favorite running recommendations, see our most popular Running Gear guides:
The Winners
Best Women's Trail Running Shorts: Patagonia Strider Pro
Sizes: XXS-XL
Rise: Medium
Pockets: 1 zip pocket, 2 side stash pockets
Reflective: Yes
Inseam lengths available: 3.5", 5”
Liner: Yes
Fabric/Material: 90% polyester (100% recycled), 10% spandex
What we liked: generous pockets, well ventilated, quick-drying, minimal design, sustainable materials, Fair Trade certified sewn
What we didn't like: new design (which we love) is entirely different from old model, so folks who liked the low rise may not like the updated model as much, can’t fit the largest phones
The Strider Pro has long been our winner for best women’s running shorts. This season, Patagonia gave them a complete makeover and somehow made them even better. While still similar in some aspects, there are some key differences in these shorts that are also improvements—in fabric, fit, and comfort. Nonetheless, they still reign as our favorite pair of running shorts thanks to Patagonia’s thoughtful design and quality make.
After testing dozens of women’s running shorts, the Patagonia Strider Pro stands out as a clear winner for the best women's shorts for running. The Strider Pro shorts have all the best features we look for in a good pair of running shorts, without any unnecessary added bulk. They’re supremely comfortable, highly breathable, quick-drying, and capable of schlepping snacks, all while boasting excellent durability. That's one reason why it's also the overall winner for best men's running shorts, too.
The combination of material, pockets, and fit make the Strider Pro the ideal short for everything from neighborhood jogs to mountain ultra-marathons.
Compare Prices Of The Patagonia Strider Pro
-
We loved the light polyester ripstop material in the older model of the Strider Pro shorts, but there was one thing that material lacked: stretch. The updated version is still made primarily with polyester (which is 100% recycled), but they now have 4-way stretch, thanks to some spandex woven into the shorts. This ultimately makes the shorts more comfortable, especially for trail runs when big steps and dynamic movements are the name of the game (though they are equally great on roads and at the gym). The shorts are soft and light with a barely-there feel.
As with the older model, the shorts meet bluesign® criteria. However, now they are Fair Trade Certified sewn.
The cut is also different than the older model. We like the new mid-rise fit of the shorts, but if you liked the old low-rise, you may be disappointed.
-
The new material dries just about as quickly as the old, but during testing in temperamental spring mountain weather we found the PFC-free DWR treatment on the updated model to shed moisture even better. As far as abrasion resistance goes, we have not encountered any issues when testing the updated version, but we do think the older material is slightly better at that. However, we’re happy to make the trade for the added stretch and comfort.
The material of the inner mesh liner of these shorts is thin and wonderfully breathable (more so than the old version). We were happy to have such a soft and minimal layer on runs when the sweat was pouring.
-
These lined shorts have a 3.5-inch inseam, which we think is the sweet spot, but personal preference reigns here. The old model had a 3-inch inseam, and we appreciate the coverage that extra half-inch adds.
The Strider Pro is now a mid-rise short, scrapping the low-rise waistband in place of a wider and higher one. While the old model was comfortable, the new waistband design is at least as comfortable (if not more), and it is certainly more flattering on different body types.
Another change with the Strider Pro is in the seams. The new models have bonded seams rather than stitched ones, lowering the potential for chafing even more. In testing both the old model and the new ones, we never encountered any issues with chafing.
We found the Strider Pros to fit true to size, with an internal infinity drawcord to dial in the fit. Though it sits on the inside of the waistband, it never caused any chafing.
-
The Strider Pro has two stretchy envelope pockets and one back zippered pocket for stashing car keys or other essentials. None of the pockets are large enough for many larger phones (iPhone Pros or Pixels), but there’s plenty of room for snacks (iPhone 15 can squeeze in). The side envelope pockets served us well on long runs (including a marathon) while carrying gels and other fuel.
-
We tested these shorts on everything from short jogs in the alpine to long, hot runs with a vertical mile of climbing in the Grand Canyon — and even wore them while training for and racing a marathon in the mountains of southern Colorado. They're also the best hiking shorts in our guide to thru-hiking shorts.
After so many miles in these shorts, they’re the first pair we reach for on an adventure that involves running shoes. The Patagonia Strider Pro is the clear winner of our award for best running shorts.
Best trail running shorts for long runs: Janji Pace Shorts
Price: $74, $78
Sizes: XXS-3XL
Rise: High
Pockets: 4; two deep side drop-in pockets, internal small waistband pocket, back pocket that doubles as a pass-through pocket for extra layers (no zippers on any of the pockets)
Phone pocket: Yes
Reflective elements: Yes
Inseam options: 5”, 7”
Liner: No
Fabric: nylon, spandex, and polyester power mesh lining on waistband
What we liked: tons of pockets to stash gear, gels, or your phone; hems with silicone grippers to keep the shorts from riding up
What we didn't like: Features are a bit overkill for shorter runs; the drawstring can easily come out when machine washing
If you are heading out on a long trail run deep into the woods where you’ll need plenty of water, gels, layers, and snacks, the Janji Pace Shorts have all the necessary pockets and more. Among trail-running friends, these are a cult favorite for their features, fit, and overall support for long runs.
The leg openings are part of why these are always a fan favorite—they have silicone grippers on the inside edge to keep the legs from rolling up, and they are also seamless, so nothing extra can dig into your thighs.
The 7” inseam was perfect to prevent my legs from rubbing together and thus chafing.
View the Janji Pace Shorts
-
The Janji Pace are true-to-size shorts that offer mid- to high-compression to keep your muscles as fresh as possible when you are logging many miles. The compression isn’t as tight as the Arc’teryx Essent Utility shorts (our winner for best compression shorts), but it is close. Even with that added support, the waistband never felt too constricting, and neither did the leg openings.
-
The blend of nylon and spandex has a fitted, snug feel while still allowing plenty of movement. When climbing steep hills, running stairs, or rock hopping your way down a trail, my gait was never hindered. The shorts move and stretch with you in all directions.
-
Even with the pockets loaded up, these shorts never moved out of place. There are four pockets in total, including a slip-through pocket on the back of the waist for extra layers.
On the side are two drop-in pockets, and on the back is a small internal pocket. This small pocket doesn’t zip or have an envelope closure, so I’d be cautious of putting anything super important in there, but lip balm or gels fit perfectly. With the deep side pockets, I was able to easily slip my iPhone in and experienced no bounce while running. Even though there are no zippered pockets, the pocket on the right leg has an attached elastic loop to clip in a key for added security.
-
The waistband is 3 inches in length and sits right at the belly button. It’s double-layered and has a drawstring, which I never had to use due to the high compression. I never found the waistband rolling down during longer runs.
-
We found no wear on the Janji shorts after many test runs. Seams stayed intact with no fraying, and the overall compression and stretchiness remained after many washes.
-
A 5” inseam is also available. The 7” length could feel a bit long for some runners, especially on hotter days, but the shorts are made from a lightweight, breathable blend of 68% Nylon and 32% Spandex. Even on humid days in the Midwest, I never felt swampy or sticky.
Best women's trail running shorts for hot and dusty runs: REI Co-op Swiftland
Price: $60-$65
Sizes: XS-3XL
Rise: high rise
Pockets: 3
Reflective: Yes
Inseam lengths available: 5”
Liner: Yes
Fabric/material: 73% nylon/27% spandex
What we liked: The stretchy and soft material, breathability, a back zippered pocket that can hold a phone, inclusive sizing
What we didn't like: Waistband is a little tight
At first glance, the REI Co-op Swiftland Running shorts seem like a basic pair of trail running shorts. Once diving into them, though, you’ll find an extremely lightweight pair of shorts with a sneaky amount of features.
If you are going to be running in the desert, the Swiftlands will keep the air flowing, keep you dry, and keep your run smooth.
A pair of women's mediums weighs only 3.5 ounces, making it one of the lightest pairs we tested. That low weight, combined with a moisture-wicking, quick-drying nylon-and-spandex blend, provides a barely-there feel that is comfortable for many miles.
The fabric has tiny holes that let air flow easily but don't make for see-through shorts. Plus, these shorts are extremely stretchy. While most back zippered pockets won’t easily fit a phone, this one stretches to accommodate even a larger phone.
View the REI Co-op Swiftland
-
In addition to the secure zipper pocket on the back, there is one small internal stash pocket in front and one side stash pocket that comes with a tiny carabiner key loop. The waistband is two inches wide and has a drawstring.
-
On the front leg is a reflective logo; reflective accents are on the back. The built-in liner is soft and didn't bunch or ride up while training. Overall, there are actually a good number of features for a mid-priced pair of shorts.
-
Normally, I can only comfortably run in tight-fitting shorts, but these worked for my body type (read: thighs rub together) on short mileage runs in hot weather and slightly humidity. One noticeable thing about the fit was that, once on, the shorts fit comfortably, but the waistband was slightly tight when pulling them over my hips and butt.
-
One thing we really liked about the Swiftland is that it is available in plus sizes. Ultimately, we liked the Oiselle Roga better and they are available in sizes from 0 to 26, but those shorts cost $15 more. For more options, see our Best Plus Size Outdoor Apparel guide.
Best trail running shorts for Steep climbs: Patagonia Maipo
Price: $75
Sizes: XXS-XXL
Rise: High
Pockets: two side drop-in pockets
Phone pocket: Yes
Reflective elements: No
Inseam options: 8”
Liner: No
Fabric: Nylon, Spandex
What we liked: mid-level compression, durability, soft feel
What we didn't like: there are only two pockets
The Patagonia Maipo shorts are a pretty basic, minimal pair—but they're still quite possibly my favorite, especially for grueling trail runs with lots of elevation gain. They are 8” long, which is longer than most other tighter shorts, but with the extremely lightweight, thin fabric, they don’t feel like you are wearing a longer pair of shorts. Rather, the 8” inseam ensures that your legs won’t rub together and chafe. The leg openings are tight enough to stay put with full body movements while climbing hills, but don’t dig into the legs. And even in the longer length, the nylon-spandex blend is extremely stretchy, so the shorts move with you with every big step and stride.
These are the ideal compression, weight, and length for mid-length trail runs in warm or hot weather with plenty of steep climbs. The material is quick-drying and moisture-wicking, which helped with overall comfort after getting splashed on a few stream crossings.
Read our in-depth review of the Patagonia Maipo shorts here.
View the Patagonia Maipo
-
We’ve tested the Maipo shorts for the past two years, running in them and washing them almost weekly. That supportive stretch has yet to sag or loosen. These offer mid-level compression with a next-to-skin feel but aren’t nearly as compressive as the Arc’teryx Essent Utility shorts or the Janji Pace shorts. Along with not stretching out after years of use, the durability of the fabric and seams has also held up. Even with a few falls and resting on plenty of rough boulders, there are no snags or pulls. The flatlock seams are still intact, and there are only a few spots of pilling on the inner thighs.
-
There are two drop-in pockets on the sides of the legs that hold an iPhone 16 with minimal to no bounce during runs. The pockets are deep and run almost the entire length of the shorts, so I have stuffed my keys into the bottom without worrying about them falling out.
-
The waistband is 4 inches long and uses two layers of fabric, so you get support without extra weight or trapping in heat. On longer trail runs, the waistband would start to slip down around 6 miles. Because of the soft fabric and mid-level compression, having the waistband sit lower on the body wasn’t too noticeable, especially if we stayed in the zone while on the trail. There is no drawcord.
-
Pop these on when you want to forget about anything else but your trail run. They are flexible, soft, and stay with you no matter how hard you are trekking up those hills.
Best women's trail running shorts with phone pocket: rabbit Leggy Smashems
Price: $70
Sizes: XS-XL
Rise: Mid
Pockets: 6; Two side drop-in pockets, one zippered back pocket, 360 mesh waistband pocket
Phone pocket: Yes
Reflective elements: Yes
Inseam options: 5”, 7”
Liner: No
Fabric: Polyester, spandex, and nylon
What we liked: 6 pockets, one of which is zippered; quick-drying material
What we didn't like: the hemline and waistband dig in a bit; not inclusive sizing
If you need a pair of shorts that can fit your phone in multiple pockets, opt for the rabbit Leggy Smashems. They are a solid pair of shorts for any run, but they stand out for their varied pockets.
The pockets include two side drop-ins, one zippered back pocket on the waistband, and three more pockets on the front mesh waistband. My iPhone 16 in an OtterBox case fit easily in the side pockets and the stretchy mesh front pockets, but was a squeeze to get into the back zippered pocket. There was no bounce when using the side pockets and very minimal bounce if the phone was in the front. The drop-in pockets could have been deeper, but the numerous waistband pockets made storage not an issue.
For more, read our in-depth review of the rabbit Leggy Smashems.
View the rabbit Leggy Smashems
-
These are ideal for any run length, though the number of pockets might be overkill for shorter trail runs. On long trail runs, you can stash your phone, gel, snacks, and even small water bottles or flasks.
-
We'll be honest: The fit of these shorts felt funky when first getting them on, but then felt completely fine when running. It took some effort to get them on as they felt almost too small because the waistband didn’t quite stretch enough to get over our hips and butts. Similarly, the leg openings dug slightly into the thighs and didn’t have silicone grippers on the bottom or an open cut, unlike the Janji Pace Shorts, the best overall road running shorts in our Best Road Running Shorts guide.
-
Even with the slightly weird fit, the Leggy Smashems were comfortable, stretchy, and supportive once I started running. We tested a pair with a 5” inseam (a 7” inseam is also available) and experienced only a bit of chafing from our legs rubbing together at the end of a 4.5-mile run in hot, humid weather in the Midwest.
-
The shorts have a mid-level compression. The 3-inch-wide waistband has an internal drawstring, which didn’t lie flat and bunched up a bit. The waistband also isn’t structured, so it provides little support around the stomach.
-
They are also made from quick-drying, lightweight Polyester, spandex, and nylon, which were nice to have during a run in Wisconsin in 75-degree weather and high humidity. They are also constructed with Ionic+ silver technology, which is said to eliminate odor, fight bacteria, and feel cool to the touch. After many test runs and machine washing, there is no stretching, wear and tear, or pilling.
Best women's trail running shorts with Built-In Liner: Oiselle Roga
Price: $79
Sizes: 2-26
Rise: Low
Pocket: rear zip pocket
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 4" and 6"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/Material: Roga Stretch Woven fabric (polyester/spandex)
What we liked: feels like we aren't wearing anything, style, very comfortable waistband
What we didn't like: may not have the durability of other shorts (but wasn't designed for that)
The vast majority of running shorts in our test include a built-in liner, but they aren’t all built the same. The Oiselle Roga shorts are some of the most comfortable with no bunching, chafing, or awkward lines.
We think a good pair of running shorts should be something you forget you’re even wearing. We feel that way with the Rogas on. Not only are the Rogas our winner for best with a built-in liner, but they’re also a contender for the best plus-size women’s running shorts with the most inclusive sizing we found on women’s running shorts up to 26.
View The Oiselle Roga
-
The Rogas have an excellent fit and an incredibly comfortable medium-wide waistband. The built-in technical liner doesn’t move when you run, whether you are sprinting or climbing hills. They fit true to size and, like many other favorites, have a seamless, continuous drawcord, so you can cinch them tighter if needed.
The polyester and spandex shorts are stretchy, breathable, and comfortable on the move and when chilling post-run. The 4-inch inseam hits the sweet spot of casual coverage without looking baggy.
We appreciate that the Rogas are available in plus sizes. We're currently testing this. In the meantime, see our guide to the Best Plus Size Outdoor Clothing for more recommendations.
-
Oiselle is a women-founded company and that shows in their thoughtfulness and attention to details that matter to women runners.
The Roga shorts have one rear zippered pocket large enough to fit low-profile phones or snacks. The only downside when it comes to features is that the logo on the side of the shorts is not reflective.
-
These run shorts stood up to testing on everything from road runs, to bike paths, to trail runs — the comfort never let us down.
Another Treeline writer, Kate Hoch, uses them for daily CrossFit workouts in addition to moderate runs.
Prefer a little more coverage? The Roga is also offered in a long version with a 6-inch inseam.
Best compression women’s trail running shorts: Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility Short
Price: $90
Sizes: 00-26
Rise: High
Pockets: 4; Two deep side drop-in pockets, large back waistband pocket with key loop, one large front waistband pocket that extends from hip to hip
Phone pocket: Yes
Reflective elements: Yes
Inseam options: 6”
Liner: No
Fabric: 71% Chira nylon, 29% elastane
What we liked: plenty of pockets to securely fit all gear, higher compression for added support
What we didn't like: no zippered pockets, pricey
Some runners may want additional support in their running shorts, in which case a short with mid-to-high compression is a great option. Compression shorts have a tight spandex fit designed to target specific muscle groups for added support, which in turn helps reduce fatigue in those muscles. The Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility Short had the highest compression of any form-fitting shorts we tested, other than the 2XU Core Compression shorts (below).
So why did the Arc’teryx win this category then? Because, along with a supportive fit, these trail running shorts have all the features you need for a long run and have lasted for at least 2 years of regular use.
For more information, see our in-depth review of the Arc'teryx Essent High-Rise Utility running shorts.
Compare Prices of the Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility Short
-
The pockets on these shorts can carry everything you need on a trail run, so technically, you wouldn’t need to wear a vest if you didn’t want to. The sides have two full-length drop-in pockets that easily fit an iPhone with an OtterBox case or even a small flask. There was no bounce, even when pushing faster downhill.
I’ve stashed my key at the bottom of these pockets without worrying, but there is also a key loop in the back envelope pocket for extra security. Even though there isn’t a zippered pocket, I’ve never lost anything on the trail.
-
The front waistband has a large mesh pocket secured with minimal stitching, so you can load it up with many, many gels if you want to or plenty of dog-poop bags. If this front has a lot of items in it, the waistband will start to sag slightly after a few miles, but not as much as with other shorts tested. The waistband is also tighter than the other shorts we tested; one tester found it too tight, and it dug in, while others were okay with the fit.
-
We’ve found that the 6” inseam is the perfect length for tighter shorts if your legs rub together. Five inches can be too short for some bodies and cause chafing, while 7 inches or longer can feel like too much fabric. At 6 inches, and with the silicone grippers on the inside of the leg openings, the shorts never rolled up or moved out of place. They are one of the pricier options for trail-running shorts, but they will be the only pair you need.
-
If you want a pair of tight-fitting shorts with plenty of pockets that will last season after season without pilling or seams ripping, choose the Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility Short.
Best Women's 2-In-1 Trail Running Shorts: Brooks High Point 3” 2-In-1
Sizes: XS-XL
Rise: Medium
Pockets: 1 zip pocket, 4 side stash pockets
Reflective: Yes
Inseam lengths available: 3"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/material: 79% polyester, 21% spandex
What we liked: generous pockets, comfortable, good coverage
What we didn't like: 2-in-1 design is not for everyone
For folks who like a little extra coverage and a smidge of compression from their running shorts will love the 2-in-1 design of the Brooks High Point. We tested these shorts on runs around Colorado’s mountains and found them to be a well-designed and comfortable pair of shorts decked out with features for long days logging lots of miles.
View the Brooks high point 3” 2-in-1
-
The High Point shorts are a 2-in-1 pair of running shorts, with a next-to-skin spandex lining that hits mid-thigh, and a lightweight, water-resistant overshort that is slightly shorter than the liner. Unlike other shorts in our test, the liner of these shorts offers more coverage for those who prefer that. The spandex liner offers some compression, though they’re not particularly snug. They’re comfortable, wick sweat fairly well, and don’t ride up mid-stride.
The waistband hits mid-rise and has a drawcord on the outside to cinch down if needed. The waistband on these shorts is not as wide as others in our test, though it was still comfortable on runs and never sagged on us.
Additionally, the shorts are made with a DWR treatment and have a UPF rating of 30+, so they do offer some protection from the sun.
The shorts aren’t quite as breathable or quick-drying as others in our test, but that is simply because there is more material in the liner. If you want more coverage with your shorts, you inevitably have to sacrifice a little breathability.
-
These shorts don’t quite have the barely-there feel of others in our test, like the Patagonia Strider Pro or the Stio Second Light, but they are very comfortable. The waistband is mid-rise, and we think it fits on the high end of that (somewhere between mid-rise and high-rise).
Both the material of the shorts and the spandex liner are stretchy and comfortable. Whether we were taking big strides or scrambling up rocks, the shorts allowed us to move how we wanted while staying put and remaining comfortable.
The High Point shorts fit true to size. Though there is a drawcord in the waistband, we don’t recommend sizing up in these shorts because that would likely cause the spandex liner to fit too loosely, making it prone to riding up during runs.
-
The pockets are one of the highlights of these shorts. Similar to the Patagonia Strider Pros, they have envelope pockets on the sides which are ideal for stashing gels and snacks on long runs. They have a zippered pocket on the back of the waistband and we love that it’s large enough to fit just about any phone, or whatever else you want to squeeze in there.
-
We tested these shorts on runs in Colorado in temperamental spring weather. They were comfortable and breathable, and when the skies turned gray, they shed light precipitation with ease and remained mostly dry.
We tested the High Point shorts side by side with others in this review, comparing fit, features, and performance. Ultimately, they’re an excellent pair of running shorts, especially if you like a 2-in-1 design. And even if you don't, these are worth considering for their great pockets.
Best trail running shorts for Ultramarathons: Gnara Go Free 6” Shorts
Price: $108
Sizes: XS-3XL
Rise: High
Pockets: 2; drop-in pockets
Phone pocket: Yes
Reflective elements: Yes
Inseam options: 6”
Liner: No
Fabric: Recycled polyester, Spandex
What we liked: The GoFly Pee Zipper makes going to the bathroom so easy in the outdoors, the fit is compressive but not too tight
What we didn’t like: Slightly thicker fabric could be too warm for hot-weather trail runs
The Gnara Go Free 6-inch compressive shorts are always in my weekly rotation for running shorts, but are a must for long trail runs or ultras with no bathroom in sight. Gnara is known for their patented GoFly Pee Zipper, which makes peeing in the woods easy and private.
The GoFly zipper starts at the front, just above the crotch and unzips all the way to the waistband at the back. If you haven’t tried a pair of Gnara pants with this pee zipper yet, it is a game-changer. Simply unzip, squat, do your business and continue on. You are almost completely covered and can relieve yourself even in the sparsest forests or behind the tiniest bushes.
The zipper stays hidden in a small zipper garage on the front so that it isn’t dangling. At first, you can feel there is more fabric between your legs, but once you're running, it has never felt cumbersome or caused any chafing, even on 10-plus-mile runs.
Not only do these shorts make it easy to use the bathroom quickly with relative privacy, but they are also a solid pair for long runs. They have a mid-compression feel that has supported my muscles during long training runs in the woods, keeping me comfortable and pushing on.
View the Gnara Go Free 6" Shorts
-
There are only two pockets (drop-ins on each side of the legs), but they easily fit a phone and have no bounce when running. The high waistband sits near the belly button and only rolls down minimally during longer trail runs. Even with a supportive waistband and mid-compression, the shorts are very stretchy throughout to allow for a full range of movement.
-
The recycled polyester-spandex blend is moisture-wicking and offers UPF 50+ sun protection. It’s also slightly thicker than other similar style shorts, which is both good and bad. The good? These are very durable shorts, so if you slip and fall or whip past some bushes, you don’t have to worry about snags or pulls. But, because of that durable thickness, the Gnara bottoms can feel a bit too warm on really hot or muggy days.
-
I’ve never chafed in these, as the 6-inch inseams offer enough coverage on my thighs and are tight enough not to roll up, but they don’t cut off circulation either. The shorts are also constructed with flatlock stitching and have a reflective logo on the hem.
For more of our favorite form-fitting running shorts, check out our Best Women’s Biker Shorts of 2026 guide.
Best trail running shorts for night runs: La Sportiva Pure Shorts
Price: $59, $65
Sizes: XS-XL
Rise: Mid
Pockets: 1; zippered pocket
Phone pocket: No
Reflective elements: Yes
Inseam options: 3” and 4”
Liner: Yes
Fabric: Recycled polyester
What we liked: a zipper-secure pocket, plenty of airflow, multiple reflective accents
What we didn’t like: limited sizing, only one pocket
When it comes to running at dusk or dawn, staying visible is key. Running lights help, like the ones we tested for our Best Running Lights of 2026, but if you don’t want to wear another thing on your body, make sure your clothing and shoes have reflective details. The La Sportiva Pure shorts have reflective details on both sides, more than most other bottoms we tested, which often have only one small reflective logo.
While these are the best trail running shorts for nighttime runs, there is a lot to love about them for daytime wear, too. The lightweight construction and split create plenty of airflow for hot-weather trail runs that aren’t shaded by trees. There is a built-in liner that is soft and comfortable, and it doesn’t bunch or shift out of place during a run.
For more reflective running gear, check out what we tested in the Best Reflective Gear for Running in the Dark guide.
View the La Sportiva Pure Shorts
La Sportiva Pure Shorts—a great option for women's running shorts if you prefer loose and lined.
-
The La Sportiva Pure 3” shorts are a go-to for runners who like a loose-fitting, split short, like Treeline editor and writer Becca Downs. When it comes to charging up hills or cruising down technical trails.
Other features include an adjustable drawstring waistband and a zippered pocket on the back of the waistband. The pocket isn’t huge, but it can hold keys and fuel.
-
The 3” inseam with a generous split means there isn’t any restriction whe
-
Although these shorts took the spot for best trail running shorts for night runs, a few factors kept them from winning a more overall spot. The Pure shorts have limited sizing (XS to XL), which isn’t helpful for plus-size runners. There is also technically a 4-inch option, but it is constructed completely differently, with a different waistband style and no liner or split. And for some runners, a loose, split-style running short won’t work for their body type and can lead to a lot of chafing from legs rubbing together while running.
Best budget women’s trail running shorts: adidas racer pacer
Price: $40
Sizes: 2XS-2XL
Rise: High
Pockets: One small inner pocket
Phone pocket: No
Reflective elements: Yes
Inseam options: 3”, 5”
Liner: Yes
Fabric: Recycled polyester, Spandex
What we liked: Lined, so you don’t have to worry about underwear riding up; the shorts' fabric has tiny holes, which allow for maximum airflow on hot days
What we didn't like: There is no zipper pocket; if your legs rub together when you run, these will definitely leave you chafed.
The award for best budget women’s trail running shorts easily went to the adidas Racer Pacer shorts. At $40, the Racer Pacers are a very comfortable and breathable pair of shorts that work well for humid trail runs in hot weather. Also, when I wore these post-run, I got a ton of compliments on their cut and style.
If your legs rub together when you run, these won’t work for your body, as they do ride up pretty quickly and left us super chafed. However, if you’re looking for an affordable pair of road running shorts, the adidas Racer Pacer shorts are worth checking out.
View the adidas Racer Pacer
-
The fabric is made from moisture-wicking CLIMACOOL material, and the tiny holes in the leg fabric make these ideal for hot runs or if you get really sweaty. The loose fit of the shorts allows for a wide range of motion and airflow, especially with the slight bottom split (about 3 inches), so we never felt constricted when climbing hills or cruising down.
-
We tested the 5” inseam option, which offered a comfortable amount of coverage without being restrictive. A 3” inseam is also available. Adidas’ sizing options are quite inclusive as well, ranging from 2XS to 2XL in both inseam options. The fit is true-to-size.
-
In addition to the breathability, the shorts have a decent amount of features for a budget option. There is a comfortable liner that doesn’t bunch or chafe, plus a large reflective logo on the leg. There is only a small internal pocket that technically could fit car keys, but it isn’t secure, so be careful. Although the pockets are lacking, the waistband is one of the most comfortable we've worn and never sags on runs. It is a 3-inch, high-rise, structured waistband that is very supportive but doesn’t dig into the stomach.
-
Wear these for shorter trail runs where you don’t need to carry much, longer runs where you’ll be wearing a vest anyway, or on trails that lack shade.
Other trail running shorts we tested
Merrell Victorai Running Short
Price: $55
Sizes: XS-XXL
Rise: High
Pockets: 2
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 4"
Liner: Yes, 2-in-1
Fabric/Material: Nylon and Spandex
If you want more coverage but still prefer a tighter running short, the Merrell Victorai running shorts are a 2-in-1 option with a biker-short style lining underneath a pair of looser shorts. These are similar to the Brooks High Point 3” 2-in-1, our winner of the best 2-in-1.
There is a very small pocket on the outer back waistband; but it’s open, so only put items in there that you’d technically be okay with losing. The other pocket is a drop-in pocket on the right leg of the tight liner that easily fits my phone and has minimal bounce when running.
Merrell Victorai Running Short
The inner liner isn’t very tight at all, so you aren’t getting much support on the trail. However, even at a shorter inseam than other form-fitting shorts we tested, it didn’t ride up right away. The outer layer of shorts did ride up, though, which I didn’t necessarily feel during my trail runs, but definitely looks a bit weird and poofy. I can appreciate a baggier short, but between the outer pair of shorts and the inner liner, there was an excessive amount of fabric.
The stretchy, elastic waistband has an extremely comfortable fit. It’s 3 inches wide and structured with plenty of support, and didn’t dig in; it’s now one of my favorite waistband styles for running shorts.
Wear these in cooler temperatures and on shorter trail runs when you still want to sport shorts but need a bit more warmth with layers.
Price: $85
Sizes: XS-L
Rise: High
Pocket: 2
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 7"
Liner: None
Fabric/Material: Nylon and spandex
For quick runs on the trail where you don’t need to carry much or don’t need the added support of more compression, the KÜHL Kush shorts are a streamlined option. They are a form-fitting pair of shorts that offer low compression in an extremely soft blend of Nylon and Spandex. The breathable, moisture-wicking, and quick-drying fabric is just slightly too thick for runs in really hot weather—sport these when there is cloud coverage or your trail is in the shade. You’ll also get UPF 50 protection from the sun.
KÜHL Kush
The KÜHL Kush only has two drop-in side pockets, which is far fewer than in other trail running shorts. However, they easily fit a TK-sized smartphone and with the light compression, there was minimal bouncing. With fewer pockets than other options, these are ideal for shorter trail runs or longer ones where you’ll be wearing a vest, belt, or carrying a handheld for storage.
The 3-inch waistband sits at my belly button and doesn’t roll down. The 7-inch inseam isn’t lined with anything grippy, but since it's on the longer side, I didn’t chafe, and the hems stayed in place, whether I was running at a 12-minute pace or a 9-minute pace.
Price: $75
Sizes: XS-XL
Rise: Mid
Pocket: back zippered pocket, two front internal stash pockets and two back stash pockets
Reflective: Yes
Inseam lengths available: 2.5” and 4"
Liner: Polyester and spandex
Fabric/Material: Polyester and spandex
The rabbit Fuel n’ Fly shorts are lined, split shorts that are extremely lightweight, but still have quite a few pockets to store most things you’ll need when hitting the trails. They are ideal for hot-weather runs or racers who want minimal fabric and maximum airflow without sacrificing storage.
Pockets include two internal stash pockets in the front and two in the back for gels or other small items, and one zippered pocket on the back. An iPhone 16 (without any case) can fit in the back zipper pocket, but with a case on, it’s a very tight squeeze.
rabbit Fuel n’ Fly
The shorts offer less coverage than other options, but weigh only 4.5 ounces and have a 3-inch half-split leg design, so range of motion isn’t compromised, nor is breathability, like if you are climbing up some technical and steep terrain. The shorts sit a bit below the waist and have a drawstring, but we found the waistband was slightly loose, and we could have potentially sized down.
The built-in liner was also comfortable on short- to medium-length runs, with no bunching or chafing. Plus, the liner has an anti-odor treatment, which was great if we stopped for some food once off the trail.
The rabbit Fuel n' Fly shorts were winners for best lightweight running shorts in our best women's road running shorts guide. But we think they aren't quite as good for trail running, where you might have to carry heavier items or more fuel that could weigh down the waistband.
Price: $70
Sizes: 0-20
Rise: High
Pocket: Side zippered pocket
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 5" and 3"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/Material: 86% recycled polyester, 14% Lycra elastane
We know lululemon isn’t a running-specific brand, but for short and mid-length runs (think 5-10 miles) and gym sessions alike, we frequently reached for these shorts.
They checked all the boxes as a brand designed specifically for running, with the modesty and security of a high-waist design. We love the Track That shorts for their all-around comfort and good coverage while remaining sleek, stylish, and breathable.
The Track That High-Rise shorts are made with a soft, wicking fabric to help sweat evaporate faster when you're working hard. They are designed with a higher-rise, wide waistband and a slightly longer inseam than some others in our test, making them the best running shorts for people who want a pair that doesn’t show off too much.
While the 5” length is technically a mid-rise, it sits higher than other running shorts we tested. If you want an even higher rise, the 3” length is a true high-rise.
View The Lululemon Track That Shorts
5 Inch High-Rise
3 Inch High-Rise
The lululemon Track That running shorts are available in two lengths — 3” and the 5” that we tested here. Depending on where you run, your stride, and your body’s dimensions, you may prefer one length over another.
They fit true to size, with a continuous internal drawcord to dial in the fit if necessary. When it comes to other features, the shorts have a low-profile side zip pocket, perfect for stashing car keys or other small essentials. The shorts also have a small reflective logo for added visibility.
The Track That short is available in the 5"-inseam we tested, as well as a 3" length for runners who prefer a more split-short design.
Price: $55
Sizes: XS-XXL
Rise: High
Pockets: 0
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 7"
Liner: Nylon and elastane (Lycra)
Fabric/Material: Nylon and Lycra
The 2XU Core Compression shorts proved to be a comfortable fit and reduced chafing. They have a snug fit and a longer inseam that hits just above the knee so that the benefits of the compression hit all the muscles in the upper leg. You get a wide waistband for comfort as well. We've tested 2XU's other models, and our only issue is that this model has a drawstring, which seemed unnecessary given the level of compression.
We found that the nylon and elastane fabric in these shorts is just enough to provide compression without being too thick to limit breathability. These shorts also have UPF fabric, meaning they effectively block harmful UV rays without the need for sunscreen.
View the 2XU Core Compression
The one drawback is that they do not have any pockets, so most people opt for a running belt, a hydration running vest or a smartphone armband case while running in these shorts. They also lack reflective details; you may want to opt for a reflective top for better visibility.
A similar model of the 2XU Compression shorts was a winner in our best short tights guide, focusing on biker shorts-style shorts for running, hiking, and being active. If you know you like compression-style shorts, that guide is a good place to find models that may work for you.
Price: $34
Sizes: XS-3XL
Rise: Low
Pocket: Zippered back pocket
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 3" and 5"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/material: polyester
What we liked: value for the price, size inclusivity, time-tested style and durability, color options, comfort, coverage
What we didn't like: does not offer extra features like multiple pockets or water repellent coatings, can bunch in the front
For running shorts under $40, the Nike Tempo is another favorite for its comfort, fit, and time-tested style and durability. The Tempo does not offer extra features, like multiple pockets or water-repellent coatings. However, it does deliver a reliable, comfortable pair of running shorts for almost any occasion.
These shorts have a 3-inch inseam, but we think they provide more coverage overall than the Patagonia Strider Pro, which has the same inseam length. They fit true to size and have a drawcord in the waistband (not continuous, though, so don’t let it get lost in the wash). Another aspect we appreciate: Nike makes these shorts in traditional sizes but also offers plus sizes up to 3X.
We found the polyester fabric breathes and moves well on hot summer runs outside, in the gym, or on the track — mesh panels stitched into the sides help with this. There’s a small internal stash pocket in the liner of the shorts, just large enough for a car key or one gel. Unlike the other shorts in our test, the Tempo shorts have no reflective details, so it’s best to keep them in the gym once the sun goes down.
Compare Prices Of The Nike Tempo
Price: $109
Sizes: XS-XL
Rise: Medium
Pockets: key pocket, thigh pocket
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 4"
Liner: No
Fabric/Material: 86% recycled nylon/14% elastane flex1 fabric 106 g/m2
The Norrona senja flex1 shorts are simple in their overall cut and design—forgoing a liner—while still using a high-performance fabric and stitching lots of pockets into the waistband.
The senja flex1 shorts are made with an airy softshell fabric that’s light, breathable, and quick-drying. We tested the 4-inch version and our 5’3” tester found those to be a great fit. For folks who like a longer inseam, these are also offered in an 8-inch version. We found these shorts to run a little small overall, so we’d recommend sizing up, especially for maximum comfort in the waistband.
View The Norrona senja flex1 4” Shorts
The lack of liner in these shorts makes them particularly light and airy, which is especially nice for runs in the heat. And, the softshell fabric the shorts are made of proved to be very durable and abrasion-resistant while still being everything we want in a good pair of running shorts—light, breathable, quick to dry. Plus, they’re treated with a PFAS-free DWR.
The waistband of the senja flex1 shorts is lined with little pockets galore. Small pass-through drop pockets along the sides provide space for gels and snacks, while a zippered pocket at the back keeps items like a credit card or keys secure during the run. There is also a loop-like stash pocket at the back that you could slip a light layer through, which is super handy.
The only real downside to these shorts is that they are expensive, but they do have a quality build and should offer long-lasting durability for many miles of running.
Price: $85
Sizes: XS-XL
Rise: Low
Pocket: 4; one secure rear zip pocket and three internal drop-in pockets
Reflective: No
Inseam lengths available: 3"
Liner: 85% Nylon / 15% Elastane
Fabric/material: 92% Polyester, 8% Spandex
The Tracksmith Session were a winner in our Best Men's Running Shorts guide, and we knew we had to test them.
The Session proved to be very comfortable during testing. We like the stretchy fabric–it breathes well and never causes any chafing.
View The Tracksmith Session Running Shorts
What we were less impressed by in these shorts is the overall fit. One criterion that makes our winners stand out from many of the budget shorts we tested is the fit. The most common issue we had with fit is fabric bunching in the front of the shorts. For a spendier, nice pair of running shorts, we expected Tracksmith to avoid this, but they don’t.
The updated Session now features four pockets: one secure rear zip pocket and three internal drop-in pockets. But ultimately, these are a comfortable pair of running shorts great for everyday use, but they come up short on features at this price point.
Price: $68
Sizes: 0 to 12
Rise: High
Pocket: 2; including back zippered pocket
Reflective: Yes
Inseam lengths available: 2.5” and 4"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/material: Recycled polyester and elastane
The lululemon Hotty Hot High-Rise shorts were a former winner for best high-waisted short. They combine a stylish and comfortable fit with a lightweight, breathable fabric and liner. A thick waistband and roomy fit in the legs make these shorts suitable for a variety of body types.
Nearly 200 5-star reviews on lululemon’s website show that customers love the fit and feel of these shorts.
View The Lululemon Hotty Hot High Rise Running Shorts
The lululemon Hotty Hot High Rise has a 2.5-inch inseam, putting them on the shorter side of the options in this review (although there is a 4” version available if you’re looking for a longer short). We tested the 2.5-inch inseam and found it on the shorter side, feeling more like a split short than something we feel comfortable wearing when we're not running.
With one stash pocket and one zippered pocket, we found the Hotty Hot just enough to store essentials, while reflective detail gives added visibility. This makes this short a good option for road running or mixed running on roads and trails.
Some customers note that the shorts are not a true high-rise, though they add that the fit and rise are just right for running. However, a handful of customer reviews mention that sizing can be a bit off, and some recommend sizing down due to the loose fit in the legs. We liked the looser fit in the legs, though, as it accommodates thighs of varying sizes. However, this is something to remember depending on your body and preferences.
Price: $25
Sizes: XS-3XL
Rise: Low
Pocket: Front pocket and hidden key pocket
Reflective: Yes
Inseam lengths available: 3.5" and 5"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/material: polyester
We considered the Under Armour Fly-By 2.0 shorts for our budget winner, but the Nike Tempos performed better in stride. That being said, Under Armor has made a good pair of running shorts with the Fly-By. The fabric breathes and moves well, and we appreciate the reflective logo detailing. Under Armour also has among the most inclusive sizing of any brand, from XS to 3X. We found the waistband to pinch a bit, making it less comfortable than other shorts.
View The Under Armour Fly-By 2.0
Price: $88
Sizes: XXS to XXL
Rise: high
Pockets: 7 pockets
Reflective: Yes
Inseam lengths available: 3"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/Material: 80% nylon, 20% elastane
The Janji Multi Sport running shorts are comfortable and thoughtfully designed with runners' needs in mind. There are seven mesh-lined pockets that don’t bounce while you run, and a small Nite Ize S-Biner MicroLock clip to attach your keys.
The split-short design and mix of polyester, elastane, and nylon materials combine to make this short comfortable, cooling, and sweat wicking. There are micro-perforations in the material to increase breathability as well. Movement feels unhindered in these shorts, and we found them great for trail running, road running, and hiking.
View the Janji Multi Short
While not large, the reflective logo on the back of the shorts is a nice feature to increase nighttime visibility. However, if you are running in the dark, we recommend more hi-vis and reflective features than just this–check out our Best Reflective Gear for Running in the Dark guide for more.
The shorts fit true to size and the drawstring allows for some adjustability. It’s a low-waisted short, though, which some runners may find uncomfortable. One of our testers prefers high-waisted running shorts, but still found herself reaching for these due to their general comfort and ample pockets. However, as waistbands can be a major factor in how comfortable a pair of running shorts are, we recommend trying them on first or purchasing with the option to return them, as the $78 price tag can be quite the investment for running shorts.
Sizes: XS-XL
Rise: Low
Pockets: 2
Reflective: Yes (some reflective elements)
Inseam lengths available: 3"
Liner: Yes
Fabric/Material: 86% recycled polyester/14% elastane
The Smartwool Active Lined Shorts are comfortable, breathable, moisture wicking, cooling, and stylish. Made with merino wool and TENCEL Lyocell fiber, they’re both soft and odor resistant, too. The shorts include a zippered pocket and some reflective elements, though we recommend more reflective and hi-vis gear if you’ll be running in the dark.
We found the shorts run a little big, and the waist band does not adjust, so our testers had to drop down a size. This was a major pitfall of the shorts for us. Both testers agreed the shorts were comfortable, but didn’t necessarily “wow” us in any way. We recommend trying them on or purchasing with the ability to return if you don’t like the fit, especially since they cost $70, which can be quite the investment.
View the Smartwool Active Lined Shorts
Why Do I Need Trail Running-Specific Shorts?
It may seem that any pair of athletic shorts will do for running, but you’ll realize a few miles in that this is not the case. While you don’t need much gear to get out for a run, your gear needs to be just right. Finding a perfect pair of running-specific shorts means you won’t have to worry about chafing or uncomfortable shorts that fall down or get soaked in sweat.
Running shorts are explicitly designed to allow a lot of freedom of movement with the hem of the shorts. They have minimal, flatlock seams to prevent chafing. They’re made of lightweight and breathable materials. Lastly, they often have perfectly placed stash pockets so you can carry essentials along for your run.
What’s The Best Length For Trail Running Shorts?
One of the most common lengths for women’s running shorts is a 3-inch inseam, which is a little shorter than most workout shorts. According to customer reviews, this tends to be comfortable for most women’s body types and running styles.
Shorter shorts mean less fabric to get in the way while you run, which is why most runners prefer a length around 2 to 3 inches. However, the length is ultimately up to personal preference, such as modesty and what size pockets you need (for example, if you have a large phone and aren’t using a phone armband holder).
Treeline Review recognizes that there are other ways to identify other than men and women but works within the reality that clothing sizes and shapes are categorized this way. We always recommend choosing gear that works with your body dimensions and feels comfortable when you move, regardless of what is on the label.
What to look for in trail running shorts
The author testing the Oiselle Roga women’s running shorts along a creek in Colorado.
The best running shorts are designed to feel lightweight, not too hot, to breathe, and have generous pockets.
Material
Whether you're a runner who runs long races, a casual runner who lives in a hot climate or runs during the summer after work, or a hiker looking to run some downhill sections, you should look for fabric with sweat-wicking properties. When you're running, you want to get the sweat off your body to prevent the shorts from sticking to your legs or forming chafing.
If you’re a trail runner, find a pair of shorts with durable outer material, like ripstop fabric. This will help if you are running through brushy areas and need to do any bushwhacking. If you’re running on roads or at the gym, you can get away with something lighter-weight and will likely be more comfortable with that choice.
Pockets
Women's running shorts, like women's clothing in general, often don't come with great pockets.
If you plan to rack up the mileage on long-distance runs, finding a pair of shorts with plenty of useful pockets will be crucial. Many runners prefer shorts with at least a couple of pockets no matter the distance they run. A pocket can hold items like car keys or a phone for short runs, snacks, and even layers for longer runs. The best running shorts have a variety of pockets as well: a side pocket, waistband pocket, and an envelope pocket (or two!).
Elastic Waistband
After testing more than a dozen shorts, we think the best running shorts have an elastic waistband. You don’t want them constantly falling down when you run. However, we would also caution against a too-tight elastic waistband, which can be uncomfortable.
Budget
If you're a runner who plans to primarily go for jogs around the neighborhood, then spending extra money for certain fabrics or features isn’t necessary. You'll be just as well served to select a less expensive pair, and you can save money where you don’t need to spend it.
Ability To Layer
If you're a winter runner, you may consider whether it’s possible to layer your spring and summer running shorts over tights as temperatures get cooler. See our guide to Best Women’s Running Tights for more recommendations.
The Patagonia Strider Pro is a great length for running in all sorts of climates. Here, we tested an older version on a run in the Grand Canyon. Photo courtesy Stasia Stockwell.
How to choose
How much compression do you want?
Some of the shorts in this review do offer a bit of compression and extra support in a more form-fitting bottom. This type of short can help if your thighs rub together and cause chafing. The ones we tested have either low compression, like the KUHLs, or mid-to-high compression, like the Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility trail-running shorts. If you prefer running shorts with true compression, look for something from a brand that specializes in compression athletic apparel, like 2XU. You can also check out more compression shorts in our Best Biker Shorts guide.
The author testing an older pair of the Patagonia Strider Pro running shorts on trails in Colorado. Photo courtesy Stasia Stockwell.
Will you be running in the dark and does visibility matter?
If you’re often out for pre-dawn or evening runs after the sun sets, having reflective gear is important, even if you’re not on the road. It’s always good to be seen, especially if your route goes along streets at all.
If this is a priority, consider shorts like the La Sportiva Pure shorts (reviewed above), which offer good reflective detailing to make sure you’re seen when you’re out for a run. And ideally, pair your reflective shorts with a headlamp or lights featured in our Running in the Dark guide.
What do you want to take with you on the run?
Do you often carry snacks or other essentials, like car keys, when you run? If so, then having a pair of shorts with pockets can be very helpful. While there are many great running vests and packs out there for carrying lots of gear, sometimes it’s best to go fast and light, minimizing what you’re carrying. Good pockets help with that, and a few models in this review (including the Janji Pace Shorts and the Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility shorts) offer ample pocket space.
If you always wear a pack or vest when you run, or if you prefer not to carry anything in your shorts, then pockets don’t need to be a top priority in your selection.
The author testing the Stio Second Light running shorts on trail in Colorado. Photo courtesy Stasia Stockwell.
How to fit women's trail running shorts
The perfect pair of running shorts should feel like you’re wearing next to nothing at all (even if it doesn’t look like it). As it’s often said, the best gear is the stuff you forget about while you’re wearing it, and that’s especially true with running shorts. While functionality is very important in the fit, comfort ultimately reigns king. The perfect-fitting pair of running shorts can be different for different people, so it’s important to consider what you’re most comfortable in, whether that’s a high- or low-waisted pair, or a longer or shorter inseam. Here are some basics to consider no matter what your personal preferences are.
Waist fit
Waist fit is a crucial factor in finding the right pair of shorts. They should be snug enough that they don’t ride down at all when you run, but not so tight that they feel constricting or uncomfortable. Many models have drawstrings built into the waistband that can help keep shorts comfortably snug, and that’s often helpful if you’re in between sizes.
Avoiding ride down
While the right fit in the waist should offer comfort first and foremost, it should also prevent the shorts from falling down as you run, and you shouldn’t need to make any other adjustments once they’re on. This is especially important to consider for shorts that have pockets for fuel or a phone, which make them more likely to ride down. Ensure that the fit is not too loose in order to have good functionality.
Length
The length of your running shorts often comes down to personal preference. Many models are made with shorter inseams for the sake of weight savings, comfort, and allowing you to stay cool on hot summer runs. But, there are options out there with longer inseams as well, if you prefer more coverage.
Material and stretch
The material that running shorts are made of should be light, soft, and reasonably stretchy while maintaining good durability overall. Most running shorts are made of nylon or polyester blends of fabric, often with a small amount of spandex woven in for stretch. You want plenty of freedom of movement for your legs, whether that comes from stretch in the fabric or a split seam that allows for more motion.
If you’re a trail runner who is often out in all sorts of weather and conditions, it’s worth considering a pair that dries very quickly; some shorts also have a DWR treatment for added water repellency.
If you run at the gym or on roads, you don’t need DWR as much (and can probably save some money by opting for a pair without). Check out our Best Road Running Shorts for Women guide to learn more.
Seam placement
Seam placement is crucial for avoiding chafing when you run. Consider shorts that have minimal seams that are low-profile for comfort. Many models will not have a seam at all on the inside of the inseam in order to help with comfort and prevent chafing.
How To Prevent Chafing While Running
To prevent chafing, avoid shorts that have a seam on the inseam. Most people find that the inseam is the source of chafing. Many runners also apply lubricants like Body Glide to the inner leg. See our guide to Best Anti-Chafe Cream for Hikers, Runners, and Bikers for more anti-chafing lubricants we like.
The best way to prevent chafing is to find a good pair of shorts with the right fit. If you’ve had bad luck with chafing, you may find that a tighter-fitting short, like our winner, the Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility shorts, or the Janji Pace shorts, can protect your inner thighs from rubbing together.
Many runners like me find that biker-style shorts can reduce chafing compared to traditional, flowy trail running shorts. The only shorts that seem to straddle the line for me are the Title Nine Anti-Run shorts, which are like a hybrid of the two.
Trail running shorts care and maintenance
Running shorts get put through a lot: sweat, sunscreen, trail dirt, and the occasional creek crossing if you're like me and can't resist cooling off mid-run. A little care goes a long way in keeping them performing well.
Check the tag before you wash anything for the first time, but most of the shorts in this guide hold up fine in a regular machine wash on a delicate or cold cycle. I wash mine after pretty much every run, especially in summer, since sweat and salt buildup will start to affect the fabric's wicking ability if you let it sit too long.
Skip the fabric softener. It coats the fibers and works against the moisture-wicking properties that make these shorts worth the extra money over a cotton pair. A regular detergent is fine for most shorts. If your pair has a DWR treatment, like the Norrona shorts in this guide, a technical wash like Nikwax will do a better job of preserving that water repellency than standard detergent.
I almost always air dry. Most of these fabrics are thin and quick-drying anyway, so it's not the inconvenience it sounds like, and skipping the dryer noticeably extends how long the elastic in the waistband holds up. If you do need to use a dryer, keep it on low heat and don't leave them in longer than necessary.
Store them somewhere dry and out of direct sun. I just keep mine folded in a drawer with the rest of my running clothes, nothing fancy needed.
The biggest thing that actually extends the life of a pair of running shorts, more than any washing routine, is just washing them promptly after every run. Letting sweat sit in the fabric for days before washing is what really breaks down the wicking treatment and causes odor that's hard to fully get rid of later.
Do I Need Running Shorts With A Liner?
We tested the Outdoor Voices Hudson 2.5 short, which has a liner. Shorts with liners may be useful to reduce chafing.
Most women’s running-specific shorts will come with a built-in liner (as do most men’s running shorts). Liners help with the overall comfort of the short, wick away sweat, and provide extra coverage since most pairs have shorter inseams. Especially if you’re planning to run often or for long distances, you’ll want a pair of running shorts with a liner.
Treeline Review writer Becca Downs testing the Oiselle Firecracker shorts.
FAQ
-
Most trail runners prefer a 3–5 inch inseam—short enough for freedom of movement yet long enough to minimize ride-up. If you want extra thigh coverage or a phone-sized pocket, choose 5–7 inches; for maximum speed and airflow, go shorter (2–3 inches).
-
A built-in liner wicks sweat, adds light support, and prevents fabric-on-skin chafing, making it the go-to choice for runs longer than 30 minutes. If you prefer your own underwear or compression shorts, look for “liner-free” models or 2-in-1 designs.
-
The waistband should stay put without digging in, leg openings should glide—not pinch—and seams should be flat or bonded. A brief “shake test” (squat and jog in place) should reveal zero ride-up or hot spots before you hit the trail.
-
Compression shorts reduce muscle vibration and inner-thigh chafing, especially on ultras or technical descents. Split-leg shorts are lighter and cooler for short, fast sessions. Many runners keep one of each style in rotation.
-
Look for at least one secure zip pocket for keys and a stretch envelope or phone pocket if you run vest-free. Premium models (e.g., Patagonia Strider Pro) offer 3–5 waistband pockets that can hold gels, gloves, or a phone without bounce.
-
Opt for recycled polyester or nylon-spandex blends with at least 10% spandex for four-way stretch. A PFC-free DWR helps shed drizzle, while mesh panels boost airflow. Cotton blends trap moisture and should be avoided on long trail days.
-
Yes. Breathable, quick-dry fabrics and secure pockets make trail running shorts excellent for day hikes, strength sessions, or travel. If you’ll carry heavy phones or maps, choose styles with reinforced waistbands and zip pockets rated for bounce-free storage.
How we tested
We’ve spent six years testing over 30 different models of women’s running shorts. Three different testers of different body shapes, sizes, and trail running styles tested these shorts on everything from casual urban trails in Wisconsin to all-day runs in the Grand Canyon and skyrunning races in Washington.
One of our testers specialized in testing on mountain runs in Colorado’s high country and alpine terrain, with everything from quick 2-mile runs to 20-mile adventures. Two of our testers primarily focused on foothill trails near Denver and Golden, Colorado.
We also tested in the southern Utah desert, the humid trails of Wisconsin, and in the Grand Canyon in the heat of summer, where we were able to get a good idea of how these shorts perform in tough, hot conditions.
We factored in features like how many pockets each short had and if they could carry an iPhone with minimal bounce, how easily the waistband rolled down while running or stretching, if there was any pilling after multiple machine washes, and for form-fitting shorts, marking where the leg opening started and where it ended or if it rolled up after runs or climbs.
- Runs from 2 to 20 miles
- Urban, foothill, and alpine trails
- Desert and summer heat
- Humid Midwest conditions
- Skyrunning races and all-day runs
- Fit and chafe resistance
- Waistband stability
- Pocket capacity and bounce
- Ride-up and leg opening fit
- Durability after repeated washing
Why You Should Trust Us
Mattie Schuler
Based in Boulder, Colorado, Mattie specializes in writing about outdoor adventures, gear, travel, fitness, health, and education/parenting, with more than 10 years of experience. Her areas of expertise include trail running, camping, backpacking, snowboarding, and hiking.
Mattie's favorite part of living in Boulder is the easy access to so many trails to enjoy—whether that’s hiking, trail running, or road running, she gets outside by any means with her dog, Imogene. Every summer, she trains for some sort of trail race in Colorado; in past years, she has run the Imogene Pass Run in Ouray, the West Line Winder in Buena Vista, and the Crested Butte Ultra. You can read more of Mattie’s work at her website or on her author page.
Stasia Stockwell is an adventure writer based in Colorado.
Stasia Stockwell
Stasia Stockwell is an avid outdoor adventurer and runner. She began road running in college, racing in a handful of half marathons and other shorter distance races before realizing that running in the backcountry was more her speed. She loves going for long trail runs in the mountains, including lots of vertical gains paired with killer views, alpine lakes, and wildflowers.
Stasia ran her first marathon in Silverton, Colorado (9,318’), and can’t wait to do longer, harder races and bigger personal running adventures. You can read more about her adventures and see her writing at stasiastockwell.com.
As the author of this article, Stasia is not sponsored in any way by any of the brands mentioned in this review. We aim to provide accurate and unbiased gear reviews based on thorough research, customer ratings, and professional media reviews.
To see all Stasia’s Treeline articles, see her author profile.
