Best Road Running Shorts for Women of 2026
The best women’s running shorts for road runs—from speed workouts to long runs and crossover to trails
July 8th, 2026
Home → Gear Reviews → Running
Buying road running shorts, especially if you are shopping online, is not as easy as picking a style and inseam length. A pair that fits one body type perfectly rides up or gaps on another. Liners bunch, waistbands roll, and some pockets leave your phone almost bouncing out or just don't exist at all.
And if you are uncomfortable in your shorts? You can bet getting laced up for a run and pushing through to the last mile will be even harder. Using the wrong pair could mean giving up on a run early or tolerating discomfort (and extremely painful chaffing) for miles. This guide covers the most popular type of shorts for road runners, like loose and unlined, loose and lined, 2-in-1s, or tight fitting biker-style shorts.
To test, we wore each pair across multiple training runs with varying paces before assessing and ranked the road running shorts side-by-side in their specific category. We wore these in cooler, 50-degree sunny weather as well as 75-degree, hot weather. Testers had body types that were both athletic and more curvy.
To determine which road running shorts were in fact the best, we looked at how the shorts held up over longer runs (did the waistband start to sag? Did the hems roll up and lead to chaffing?). We noted chafe points, thigh coverage, pocket usability and sizing accuracy for each pair. We prioritized performance and fit, rather than aesthetics or colorway variety, but did point out when a pair of shorts was truly flattering.
Top Pick: The best overall road running shorts are the Janji Pace Shorts ($74), which was a fairly easy choice to make. These tight-fitting shorts have numerous pockets, stay in place from the waistband to the hem, and come in both a shorter inseam at 5 inches as well as a longer one at 7 inches. They worked for short, quick runs as well as on our long-run days when we slogged past 10 miles. Plus, there is always someone sporting these on our group runs.
Prefer only biker/compression shorts? See our Best Women's Short Tights for Hiking, Running, and Outdoor Activities.
Hitting the trails rather than the pavement? Check out the Best Women’s Trail Running Shorts guide.
We write mission-driven gear reviews. To find the best gear, we combine expert reviews, everyday user opinions, and rigorous independent trail testing—never pop-up or display ads. We are reader-supported and may make a small commission from some qualifying affiliate links. Learn more.
Comparison table
| WOMEN'S SHORTS | TREELINE AWARD | SIZES | LENGTHS | LINER | RISE | COMPRESSION | POCKETS | REFLECTIVE | MSRP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janji Pace Short | Best Overall Read why |
XXS-XXXL | 5, 7" | No | High | High | 4 | Yes | $74, 78 |
| Adidas Racer Pacer Woven Short | Best Affordable Read why |
XXS-XXL | 3, 5" | Yes | High | No | 1 | Yes | $40 |
| Gnara Go Free Shorts | Best for Trail Running Read why |
XS-XXXL | 6" | No | Mid | Yes | 2 | Yes | $108 |
| Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly Shorts | Best Lightweight Read why |
XS-XL | 2.5, 4" | Yes | Mid | No | 5 | Yes | $75 |
The winners
Best overall women's running shorts: Janji Pace Short
Price: $74 (5”), $78 (7”)
Sizes: XXS to XXXL
Inseam options: 5", 7"
Rise: High
Fit: High compression
Fabric: Nylon, spandex; polyester power mesh lining on waistband
Weight: 5.1 oz
Liner: No
Pockets: Two deep side drop-in pockets, internal waistband pocket, back pocket that doubles as a pass-through pocket for extra layers
Phone pocket: Yes, side pockets can hold a phone
Waistband: High rise, drawcord
Anti-chafe construction: Yes, silicone grippers on leg openings to not rise up
Quick-dry: Yes
Machine washable: Yes
Reflective elements: Yes
What we liked: Lots of pockets and places to stash gear, fuel, or your phone; the best hems of any we tested, with silicone grippers and absolutely no riding up
What we didn't like: Features are a bit overkill for shorter runs; the longer length could be too much coverage for hotter runs; the drawstring can easily come out when washing
The Janji Pace Shorts are a favorite of runners I know—especially for race days—and I can see why. They have all the features needed for medium- to long-distance runs and a superb blend of compression and stretch, so you feel snug but not restricted while running. Learn more in our in-depth review of the Janji Pace Shorts.
Janji Pace Short
For features, you get two deep side pockets to secure a phone (one pocket also has a loop to clip a key), a small internal pocket to hold cards or keys, and a back slip-through pocket to store fuel or hold a shirt if you shed a layer. The side pockets are the deepest we tested, as they are designed to extend almost the full length of the shorts. Basically, these shorts could replace a vest for medium runs where you need some water but not a ton; you could slip a small hard-shelled bottle into the side pockets.
When it comes to fit, you get a gusseted crotch, a high, ergonomic waistband that fits the hips and waist (with an infinity waistband that won’t get pulled out in the wash), and some of the best stay-put legs we tested. The bottoms of the shorts don’t dig in at all because they are seamless, but with 2 inches of silicone grippers, they never ride up, which prevents chafing.
I tested the 7-inch inseams. You’ll get full coverage without feeling too restricted, which also makes these a solid choice for a flattering pair of tighter shorts. Even on longer, 6-plus-mile runs with hills, the Janji Pace Shorts passed the "no adjustment needed mid-run" test.
Best affordable women's running shorts: Adidas Racer Pacer
Price: $40
Sizes: 2XS - 2XL
Inseam options: 3”, 5”
Rise: High
Fit: Loose
Fabric: Recycled polyester, Spandex
Weight: 5.3
Liner: Yes
Pockets: One small inner pocket
Phone pocket: No
Waistband: 2.5-inch ruched waistband
Anti-chafe construction: No
Quick-dry: No
Machine washable: Yes
Reflective elements: Yes
What we liked: Lined, so you don’t have to worry about underwear riding up; the shorts' fabric has tiny holes, which allows for maximum airflow on hot days
What we didn't like: There is no zipper pocket, just a small inner waistband that can only fit a key or a card, but not securely; if your legs rub together when you run, these will definitely leave you chaffed.
If you like loose shorts that have a liner, the Adidas Racer Pacer is an affordable option. The 3-inch waistband is structured, but not too tight, and the loose fit makes for a high range of motion, especially with the slight split at the bottom (about 3 inches). The liner stays in place and is made from a soft, 100% recycled polyester. With the moisture-wicking CLIMACOOL material and the tiny holes in the leg fabric, these are ideal for hot runs or if you get really sweaty.
Adidas Racer Pacer
Adidas Racer Pacer—the best women's running shorts for the price.
These are a more affordable option than other loose shorts with a liner (at least half the price of other pairs we tested), but they aren’t as lightweight and lack a zippered pocket, unlike the Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly or the La Sportiva Pure. If your legs rub together when you run, these won’t work for your body, as they do ride up pretty quickly and left us super chaffed. However, if you’re looking for an affordable pair of road running shorts, the Adidas Racer Pacer shorts are worth checking out.
Best road running shorts for trail running: Gnara Go Free Shorts
Price: $108
Sizes: XS to 3XL
Inseam options: 6 inches
Rise: High
Fit: Mid-compression
Fabric: 100% recycled polyester spandex wicking blend
Weight: 5.5 oz
Liner: No
Pockets: Two side pockets
Phone pocket: Side pockets fit a phone
Waistband: Flat elastic
Anti-chafe construction: Flatlock stitching
Quick-dry: Yes
Machine washable: Yes
Reflective elements: Yes
UPF: 50+
What we liked: The GoFly Pee Zipper is truly a game changer for going to the bathroom outdoors; the fit is compressive but not too tight
What we didn’t like: The fabric is slightly thicker and can be too warm for hot-weather runs
The Gnara Go Free 6-inch compressive shorts are my go-to for long trail runs when I’m deep in the woods and nowhere even remotely close to a bathroom. Why? Because they have the patented GoFly Pee Zipper, which means that I can pee anywhere in the woods, all without having to completely drop trow and moon any passersby.
Gnara Go Free Shorts
The GoFly zipper starts at the front, just above the crotch and unzips all the way to the waistband at the back. If you haven’t tried a pair of Gnara pants with this pee zipper yet, it is a game-changer. Simply unzip, squat, do your business and continue on. You are almost completely covered and can relieve yourself even in the sparsest forests or behind the tiniest bushes.
The zipper hides in a small zipper garage on the front so it isn’t dangling, and though you can feel a bit of the extra fabric in the crotch area, it has never bothered me while running, even on 10-plus-mile runs.
In addition to making these easy to use the bathroom in, the shorts are just a solid pair of running shorts that can work for both trail and the road as they offer support, storage, and an all-around comfortable fit. They have two side pockets that fit a phone and are compressive enough to prevent bouncing, a high-waisted, thick waistband that doesn’t roll down, and a slightly thicker fabric to hold up against tree branches or butt slips as you head downhill. The thicker fabric can feel a bit warmer on long runs in high heat with no shade, but I try not to run in that type of weather anywhere, and the GoFly zipper is worth the trade-off.
I’ve never chaffed in these, as the 6-inch inseams offer enough coverage on my thighs and are tight enough to not roll up, but don’t cut off circulation either. The shorts have a UPF rating of 50 and are quick drying.
For more of our favorite trail-specific running shorts, check out our Best Women’s Trail Running Shorts guide.
Best lightweight women's running shorts: Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly Shorts
Price: $75
Sizes: XS-XL
Inseam options: 2.5”, 4”
Rise: Mid
Fit: Loose, lined
Fabric: Recycled polyester, Spandex
Weight: 4.5
Liner: Yes
Pockets: Back waistband pocket that zips, 2 front internal stash pockets and 2 back stash pockets
Phone pocket: Yes; the back zippered pocket can hold a smaller phone
Waistband: 1 inch, internal drawstring
Anti-chafe construction: No
Quick-dry: Yes
Machine washable: No
Reflective elements: Yes
What we liked: These lined, split shorts are extremely lightweight and have multiple pockets for a pair of loose shorts
What we didn't like: Hand-wash only; run big
If loose shorts work for your body type (read: no chaffing), then the Rabbit Run Fuel n’ Fly are ideal for hot-weather runners or racers who want minimal fabric and maximum airflow without sacrificing storage.
Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly Shorts
The shorts weigh 4.5 ounces and have a 3-inch half-split leg design. So, you get a full range of motion and top airflow, but you still get a zippered back pocket and two front and two back fuel pockets. If I took my iPhone out of its OtterBox case, it was able to zip into the back pocket and had minimal bounce while running. The shorts sit a bit below the waist and have a drawstring, but we found the waistband was slightly loose, and we could have potentially sized down.
The built-in liner was also comfortable on short- to medium-length runs, with no bunching or chafing. Plus, the liner has an anti-odor treatment, which was great if we stopped for a post-run coffee. The shorts also come in a 2.5” inseam, if you prefer even less fabric.
Other women's road running shorts we tested
Tracksmith Twilight Short Tights
Price: $85
Why we tested it: Tracksmith is a go-to for running apparel
Why it didn't win: Tight leg openings around the thighs
Who might still prefer it: Anyone who wants compressive shorts but might get a gap at the back of the waistband, as these do have a drawstring
The Tracksmith Twilight shorts were not the most comfortable shorts we tested, but weren’t the worst either. We wore them on various runs in mild to warm weather (60s, both sunny and overcast), but they ran small. The hem around the thigh was very much digging into my legs; the very top of the wide waistband was also tight (where there is a drawstring), which made them slightly difficult to pull up over my thighs and butt to get them on.
Tracksmith Twilight Short Tights
Once on and running, the 5-inch inseam helped with no chaffing (even when other 5-inch shorts I tested didn’t fare so well), but at least with the grey color, they weren’t flattering at all. Looks aside, they are made from a very soft and stretchy, ribbed material that offers light compression.
Pockets include two drop-in pockets and a zippered back pocket that Tracksmith says is for your phone. All of the pockets are tiny; the side ones are very slim and the zippered back one is just small. Yes, all of the pockets did fit my phone (iPhone 16 with a Otterbox case), but if you have anything bigger than an iPhone 16, you’d be out of luck for phone storage.
I used the side pockets when running, and with the light compression, I didn’t find the phone bouncing around at all. Because the back pocket is tricky to get my phone into and sometimes I pull it out to switch up a podcast, I opted for the side pockets instead. The small zippered pocket would be great for fuel, chapstick, or keys.
Price: $74
Why we tested it: Vuori is known for good athletic apparel; there are not many 2-in-1 shorts options around
Why it didn't win: The fitted shorts rode up almost immediately on my thighs
Who might still prefer it: Anyone who does want a 2-in-1 option; runners wanting a drawstring waist
Vuori is known for their athletic-wear clothing, like their soft leggings and cute athleisure looks. They wouldn’t be my go-to for running shorts, but they did have a 2-in-1 option (loose shorts over tighter shorts) where many other brands don’t. The Vuori Daily Speed Short has a biker-style short sewn in and underneath a pair of looser shorts.
Vuori Daily Speed Short
These shorter shorts left me with my thighs rubbing within 30 seconds on my runs; when I wear a compressive short that is 5 inches or 7 inches, I never chafe or have the shorts riding up. The shortness of the tight shorts, combined with no grippy silicone around the leg openings to hold them in place, meant that the first layer of shorts crept up, and then the loose shorts followed. For my body type, these did not work.
However, if you don’t tend to chafe no matter what you wear, and you want something that is slightly tight but also provides a bit of coverage, these 2-in-1s are an option. The waistband is wide (almost 3 inches) and does have a drawstring, which is perfect for anyone who tends to have a gap at the back. The shorts have one phone pocket on the tight layer. The pocket did fit my phone, and even with light compression, the phone didn’t bounce round.
Price: $88
Why we tested it: Bandit is a running gear company that seems to solve any apparel problem runners have (like a sports bra with pockets in them)
Why it didn't win: At a 5-inch inseam, I did have some chaffing
Who might still prefer it: Anyone else who doesn’t experience much chaffing, as the features and fit are top quality; runners who want a pair of highly compressive shorts
The Bandit Stamina-V Shorts almost took the top spot for overall running shorts, as they offer similarly abundant features, but they allowed for some chafing and are very tight, which might not be the most preferred fit for all runners.
Bandit Stamina-V Short
Minus the slight chaffing (even on a shorter, 3-mile run), everything else about these shorts was a runner’s dream, from the number of pockets to the high compression. These are easily the tightest pair of shorts we tested, which helped keep everything from bouncing around, whether that was my phone in a pocket or my butt as I was doing speed work.
The pockets are plentiful, with three waterproof ones for your phone and two smaller ones for fuel, keys, or the like. I did very much appreciate the waterproof phone pockets, as when I'm running or on high-temp days, my phone will definitely get a bit moist. With the pocket's inner waterproof layer, this wasn’t an issue at all.
Although the 5-inch inseam led to some chafing, it seemed mostly because my thighs needed a 6- or 7-inch inseam for them not to rub together. For anyone who could wear a 5-inch inseam and be fine, these shorts should suffice as they are clearly made by and for runners—the leg openings have gripper dots to keep them in place from rolling up, the waistband hits right at the belly button and is a thick, compressive fabric that stays put on longer runners, and the fabric is said to aid in thermoregulation for hotter days.
Another ideal feature that added to overall comfort was no awkward middle seam. Most other fitted shorts have one, but these don’t, so they stay comfortable on your lower body even if you pull them up a bit higher.
Price: $90
Why we tested it: With a name that has utility in it, we were curious about exactly how much a pair of shorts could hold without compromising the fit and movement
Why it didn't win: These shorts are expensive and have fewer features than the Janji Pace Shorts
Who might still prefer it: Runners who like a high compression, next-to-skin fit
The Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility shorts are very similar to the Janji winners in regards to plenty of helpful features and a comfortable fit no matter the mileage. Pockets include a back waistband pocket with a key loop, two drop-in thigh pockets, and one large front waistband pocket that extends from hip to hip.
Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility Short
The Acr’teryx High-Rise Essent Utility shorts are the most compressive running shorts for women that we tested.
The shorts also have silicone grippers at the hem so that they don’t ride up and a high-rise, wide waistband, with a drawstring, that very rarely rolls out of place. With a 6-inch inseam, flatlock seams, and grippy leg openings, I’ve never chaffed or rubbed in these shorts, even on 10-plus mile runs.
I’ve worn these both on road runs and on trail runs, and they’ve held up on a few falls or rocky butt scootches, as they are made from an abrasion-resistant nylon. Even on hot days with temperatures 70 and above, I stayed cool due to the breathable, moisture-wicking fabric. With the added pockets and features, these aren’t the lightest options for hot-weather running, however, so keep that balance in mind depending on the weather.
These shorts have been in my regular rotation for at least two years, and after multiple washings and usage, the high compression hasn’t lessened one bit. Learn more in our in-depth review of the Arc’teryx Essent High-Rise Utility Shorts.
Price: $85
Why we tested it: Kuhl has always crushed it in their hiking gear, and so we wanted to check out their new Kush line of activewear
Why it didn't win: Fewer pockets and features than other running-specific shorts
Who might still prefer it: Runners who want a pair of shorts they can use for running, hiking, and yoga
The Kuhl Kush shorts with light hold are extremely soft and buttery, so even though you could simply wear them around your house for lounging, they also performed well on shorter runs in warm-to-hot temperatures. For longer runs, I prefer shorts with more compression to provide overall support and reduce muscle vibration.
Kuhl Kush Short
They are made from a lightweight, breathable, moisture-wicking, quick-drying fabric, so they are ideal for temps that make you really sweat. You’ll also get UPF 50 protection from the sun.
Pockets include two side drop-in pockets that fit my iPhone 16 with an OtterBox case. The compression is light, but it still holds the phone in place while running. The 3-inch waistband sits at my belly button and doesn’t roll down. The 7-inch inseam isn’t lined with anything grippy, but since it's on the longer side, I didn’t chafe, and the hems stayed in place, whether I was running at a slower 12-minute pace or a faster 9-minute pace.
Because these are streamlined, simple shorts, they are ideal for anyone who wants to wear the same pair for running, yoga, or just hanging out.
Price: $70
Why we tested it: These shorts have six pockets (the most of any we tested), one of which is zippered
Why it didn't win: The hemline and waistband were too constrictive compared to the Janji winner
Who might still prefer it: Someone who wants tight shorts that have plenty of features, like pockets, reflective logos, and a quick-drying material
The Rabbit Leggy Smashems do have a lot of features—six pockets, one that zips, a drawstring waistband, and a quick-drying material—but the fit and construction felt uncomfortable even just putting them on (similar to the Tracksmith Twilights). The leg openings and waist were very tight and constrictive, even while the overall fit was mid-level compression. For more, read our in-depth review of the rabbit Leggy Smashems.
Rabbit Leggy Smashems
The pockets include two slim drop-in side pockets that fit a phone tightly, one zippered back pocket that does not fit a phone, and then wrap-around pockets on the front and sides of the waistband. During the run, there was some bounce, but it wasn’t hindering my movement
The Smashems do come in a 7-inch option, which is helpful if the 5-inch doesn’t work for your body type. There are no silicone grippers on the hems, but they didn’t ride up while running a few miles at both faster and more casual paces.
Price: $65
Why we tested it: For shorter runs or really hot weather, a pair of loose-fitting, lightweight shorts is a must
Why it didn't win: The Pure shorts have limited sizing (XS to XL). There is also technically a 4-inch option, but it is constructed completely differently with a different waistband and split
Who might still prefer it: If you can run in loose shorts without chaffing from your legs rubbing together, this pair of shorts will be ideal for shorter runs or hot weather
Our tester, Treeline editor and writer Becca Downs, is a fan of the La Sportiva Pure shorts with a 3-inch inseam for short- to medium-length runs. The pair has a built-in inner brief liner and a split-leg side, so the range of movement is at its max. They also have an adjustable drawstring waistband and are made from moisture-wicking 100% recycled polyester. There is just one pocket on the back, but it is zippered and large enough to hold a key and a gel pack for fueling.
La Sportiva Pure 3-inch Shorts
La Sportiva Pure Shorts—a great option for women's running shorts if you prefer loose and lined.
Price: $70
Why we tested it: Brooks is a well-known running brand that consistently has top-tier running shoes, so we figured their running shorts would be ideal as well. We also wanted to see how this tight-fitting pair compared to the winner, the Janji Pace shorts.
Why it didn't win: These shorts only have two pockets
Who might still prefer it: This is a very close second to the winning Janji Pace shorts, so if you don’t need more than two pockets, go with these
The lightweight Brooks Chaser 5-inch fitted running shorts (there are also 7-inch and loose options) have a similar fit to the Janji Pace shorts, with mid- to high-compression and support. The 5-inch inseam was too short for our body types (our legs rubbed together), but the 7-inch option would be great, as the overall fit and comfort felt fully supportive, with enough flexibility for speed work, trail runs, and longer road runs. The waistband is 4 inches long, but not constrictive and sits just above the belly button.
What is ideal about these shorts, and similar to the Janjis, is that the leg opening has no seam, so they don’t constrict your thighs. They also have a half-inch line of silicone grippers, so the legs don’t roll up.
Brooks Chaser Short Tight
Price: $79
Why we tested it: Oiselle is a women-owned brand that consistently makes good gear
Why it didn't win: The shorts were slightly too tight on the legs but loose on the waist when storing things in the pocket.
Who might still prefer it: Runners who want a soft, lined, loose pair of shorts with two zippered pockets
I had really high hopes for the Oiselle Obsession Running shorts—online, they are described as a fan favorite and lauded as a “best pair” from Title Nine. However, the 6-inch inseam didn’t work for my body type and the features, like the pockets and the mid-rise waistband, didn’t hold up either.
The shorts are made from a soft and fast-drying poly-spandex blend. There is one zippered pocket on the side and one zippered pocket on the back. My phone, an iPhone 16 with an OtterBox case and a PopSocket attached, fits in the side pocket but not in the back pocket. Because the shorts are loose, the phone bounced around in the side pocket and pulled the waistband down a bit. The 6-inch inseam did ride up when running.
Oiselle Obsession Running Shorts
Price: $75
Why we tested it: I have had these shorts for at least two years, and they are always in my weekly rotation for road and trail runs. Even after many, many uses and washes, the stretch has stayed the same.
Why it didn't win: These shorts only have two pockets
Who might still prefer it: Runners who like a mid-level compression, next-to-skin fit that doesn’t change after many seasons
The Patagonia Maipo is a staple in my running gear. They are made from an extremely soft, lightweight, recycled fabric that is ideal for hot-weather runs; the nylon-spandex blend is also fast-drying and moisture-wicking. The inseam is 8 inches, so that could feel a bit long for runners, and the waist is high-rise and four inches in length. On longer runs, about 6 miles or more, we found that the waistband started to sag. However, even at the slightly longer length, these lightweight shorts have been great for hot-weather runs in the 70s and above.
They have high durability and hold up for multiple seasons with no abrasion or seams coming undone, even with a lighter material, and I’ve definitely put them to the test. I’ve worn these on multiple trail runs where I have scooted down scree and have found no wear in the butt. The pair could use more than just two side pockets, but the pockets do easily hold our phones, gels and even a flexible water flask. The crotch has an articulated gusset, which, matched with the flexible compression, means that mobility was never an issue when doing speed work or heading uphill.
Patagonia Maipo Shorts
Price: $69
Why we tested it: Women-owned brand Title Nine often has unique apparel options that are versatile for many activities
Why it didn't win: These shorts have limited usable pockets and are better suited for hiking
Who might still prefer it: Runners who want a loose short where the legs don’t ride up
If you want a running short that isn’t tight or form-fitting, but also keeps your inner thighs from rubbing together, the Anti-Run short is it. With a 7-inch inseam, the leg openings didn’t rise up enough to cause chaffing, unlike any other pair of loose-fitting shorts we tested. Because of that longer inseam, one could say that they looked a bit dorky or unfashionable, but they were extremely comfortable for both running and hiking.
There is one zippered pocket on the back that can hold a card, keys, or gel, but the two side pockets are regular pockets, rather than drop-in pockets like on other tighter shorts. That being said, the side pockets are still fairly deep, and I was able to fit my phone in them. When running, my phone didn’t bounce out, but I was more conscious of it in my pockets, as it could definitely pop out, especially on rougher, less smooth terrain.
I am quite enamored with these unlined shorts, but would choose them for hiking rather than running because of the not-completely-secure pocket for my phone and the worry that it could bounce out during larger movements like running. For more, read my review of the Title Nine The Original Anti-Run Shorts.
Title Nine The Original Anti-Run shorts
Price: $32
Why we tested it: Not everyone wants to drop $60 plus on a pair of running shorts
Why it didn't win: The waistband was too tight and didn’t feel true to size
Who might still prefer it: Runners who want an affordable pair of shorts that are loose-fitting or need extended sizing
The Nike Tempo shorts are loose-fitting, have a built-in, comfortable liner and are made from 75 percent recycled polyester. You can choose from 17 color options and extended sizing. The Tempos offer some of the most inclusive sizing, ranging from XXS to XXL, with a plus-size option up to 4X.
The sides of the shorts feature mesh panels for better airflow, and Nike’s Dri-FIT technology wicks sweat away from your body. There is one small pocket on the inner waistband for a key, card, or gel. As these are not form-fitting, the inner leg openings did rise up, which meant chafing from thighs rubbing together.
The main issue we found with these was that the waistband was too tight. For testing, we didn’t try any of the pairs on before ordering mediums, and all fit well, but a medium in the Tempos was too tight, with the waistband digging in.
Nike Tempo
What to look for in women's running shorts
Inseam length
The inseam length of road running shorts varies with the overall style of the shorts. Shorts often used for speed or track work are loose and have an inseam of 2 to 3 inches. They offer minimal coverage but provide the best range of motion and are ideal for very hot days.
Loose shorts that are longer have an inseam of 5 to 7 inches. This offers more coverage and can reduce chafing from legs rubbing together, but also still have the potential to ride up depending on your body type.
Tighter shorts, or biker-style shorts, are often 5 to 7 inches as well and can fully eliminate any chafing from thigh contact, but could be too much coverage on days with high temperatures.
We found that for runners with thicker thighs, a 5-inch inseam might be too short and lead to chafing, whereas a 7-inch inseam might be more comfortable. Some brands offer one style of shorts in various inseam lengths.
If you want even more coverage, especially in cooler weather, you may want to consider running pants.
Liner vs. no liner
A liner is often found in loose-style shorts, not fitted ones. Liners are often chosen by runners who don’t want to wear underwear to avoid added weight or layers, but sometimes they aren’t well-constructed and can cause bunching or chafing, which can be worse than going without a liner. Having a built-in liner with loose shorts can also make it easier to use the bathroom during a trail run; simply squat, pull the crotch fabric aside, and do your business.
Other liner options can be found in 2-in-1-style shorts, like the Vuori pair, which feature a tight pair of liner shorts (often with a 2 to 3-inch inseam) and an integrated pair of loose shorts over the fitted part.
Waistband construction
Almost all of the shorts we tested have very wide waistbands, which provide slight compression at the waist. Many were also high-waisted (sitting near the belly button or above). The goal with high-waisted shorts is to keep the waistband from rolling down while you are running. We found that longer waistbands (usually 3 inches) that were high-rise and double-layered had the least chance of rolling down or shifting as we ran.
Anti-chafe construction
Not all running shorts pockets are created equal—we tested each with an iPhone 16 with an Otterbox case and PopSocket, as well as a small, hard shelled flask.
Chafing can happen either from your own legs rubbing together or from the shorts' material creating hotspots. These chaffing points often occur at the inner thigh seams, liner edges, or waistband edges. Many shorts, especially tight-fitting styles, are constructed with either bonded or flatlock seams, which aim to bond the fabric pieces together so that little to no seam is felt. No pair is universally chafe-free—body shape, distance, and sweat level all affect outcomes.
Pockets—what actually works
The need for pockets will depend on what type of run you are doing. If you are doing speed work, having a pair of shorts without pockets (or one small zippered pocket for a key) will suffice. For longer road runs or trail runs, pockets can make or break a pair of go-to running shorts. Loose-fitting shorts will usually have one or two small pockets, but not a large enough one for a phone, which is fine, as a phone in loose shorts would bounce around constantly.
All of the tight-fitting running shorts we tested had at least two side pockets. Full disclosure: I don’t buy biker-style shorts that don’t have at least side pockets. I don’t care if I am using them to run, lounge, or go to yoga—I want those pockets. The side drop-in pockets should fit a current iPhone (I tested with an iPhone 16 with an OtterBox case and a popsocket attached), and, with moderate to high compression, the phone shouldn’t bounce or fall out. Other pockets include waistband pockets on the back, usually for gels/fuel, keys, or lip balm. Sometimes these back pockets fit a phone, but I found it hard to get it in and out while running, compared to the side drop-in pockets.
Fabric and breathability
Most running shorts are made from a lightweight, breathable fabric that offers some stretch. This can be recycled polyester or a nylon-spandex-elastane blend. For fitted shorts, the fabric should retain compression even after washing (always air-dry to maintain this compression). Shorts with higher compression tend to use slightly thicker fabric, which is a bonus for durability but can feel too hot and less breathable in high temperatures.
You’ll find that some pairs are quick drying, while others are moisture wicking. Quick-drying pairs use fabric that releases moisture quickly once damp/wet, while moisture-wicking shorts help pull sweat away from the body and move it to the garment's outer layer, so your shorts aren’t clingy or more prone to chaffing.
Size range and fit inclusivity
Women's running shorts sizing can vary across brands, but we found the ones we tested to be accurate. For bottoms, I am a dependable medium, and all the pairs we tested fit well without prior try-ons. That said, make sure to check the sizing chart just in case, and read reviews to see if the shorts fit true to size. Some brands do have extended sizing, like Nike (up to XXL, as well as plus-sized options up to 4X), as well as Janji, Oiselle, and Gnara, with sizes said to fit at least a 42-inch waist and 52-inch hips.
Price and value
Most quality road running shorts are around $70, with some pairs costing more in the mid-$80s and some budget options closer to $30 a pair. If you need more features like pockets and silicone grippers, you’ll be looking at a pricier pair. If you need something simple without all the added features, a more affordable pair will suffice.
I have found that higher-priced bottoms earn their price over long periods and across multiple seasons of running due to their durability.
Types of women's running shorts explained
Loose/relaxed running shorts
These running shorts are a classic style, often featuring a stretchy waistband with a drawstring and very loose, breathable fabric. They are the least restrictive for freedom of movement, but don’t work at all for runners whose thighs rub together. Loose shorts also will have maybe one small pocket for a key, but they often cannot hold anything bigger than that. These types of shorts usually have inseams only a few inches long.
Semi-fitted running shorts
With a slightly longer inseam, semi-fitted running shorts offer a nice blend of lightweight comfort and a bit more coverage to help prevent chafing. They are not as airy as shorter options, but do allow for more airflow than compression styles. Inseams often range from 3 to 5 inches, though some, like those from Oiselle, offer semi-fitted running shorts with a 7-inch inseam.
2-in-1 running shorts
A 2-in-1 running short has a tighter short layer that is underneath and an outer, looser short. Benefits of this style include slightly more coverage if you don’t want a yoga-tight short, but it also means you are wearing an extra layer of unnecessary fabric.
Compression running shorts
Compression shorts, fitted, or biker-style shorts, have become more popular among runners in recent years. They are tight, but if the pair fits properly, they won’t ride up and can completely prevent chafing from your thighs rubbing together. You get less airflow, but more pockets that can hold a phone and even a small water bottle with little to no bounce. For a full review of tight shorts to choose from, head to the Best Women’s Short Tights guide.
For our testing purposes, we designated shorts under the various levels of compression:
High compression—shorts with a tight, second-skin feel that provides maximum support; pictures these taking some effort to get on and off
Medium compression—shorts that are fitted and provide moderate compression; feel tight but not restrictive
Light compression—shorts that are fitted and stretchy, easy to get on and off
Split running shorts
Similar to the loose shorts, split-running shorts have a very short inseam with a high side split for maximum range of motion. These are popular for speed work, racing, or extremely hot weather, but might not be as comfortable for everyday training.
Trail running shorts
Trail running shorts are typically more durable, and ideally have more secure pockets that either zip shut or are envelope style, where the fabric overlaps so items can’t jumble out. Want more trail running options? See our Best Women’s Trail Running Shorts of 2025.
How to choose women's running shorts
Knowing where chafe happens helps you pick construction that prevents it. Testers found that 6 inch inseams or longer prevent chaffing, where 5” inseams didn’t always prevent chaffing.
Long-distance road running and marathon training — When it’s time for a long run, choose shorts that have a long enough inseam and fit properly to avoid any sort of chafing. Then, think about what you’ll store in your running vest versus what you’ll want in easy-to-reach side pockets on the shorts. If you tend to chafe regardless, opt for a tight pair of shorts with a five- or seven-inch inseam.
Trail running — Trail running shorts ideally offer more robustness and features than road running shorts. Look for a slightly more durable fabric, just in case you take a spill on some scree or run against brush. For features, make sure the pockets can either zip closed or are secure enough to hold a phone or keys without falling out (especially if you are bouncing around on a rugged or steep trail). Learn more in our Best Women’s Trail Running Shorts guide.
Hot-weather running — If you’ll be sweating in the heat, aim for a pair of shorts that is lightweight, moisture wicking, and breathable, like those made from polyester. Some options also offer UPF protection.
Racing — Don’t debut a new pair of shorts on race day. Instead, go for your most consistently comfortable and convenient pair that can hold any gels or fuel you need.
Gym and cross-training — If you are hitting the treadmill and the weight room, opt for shorts that provide ample coverage during heavy lifting and deep squats.
Short road runs and speed work — If you are going out for a short run or plan to do some type of speed work, choose a pair of shorts that doesn’t have all the extra pockets, loops or zippers, so that lightness and freedom of movement are prioritized.
Fit and sizing guidance for women's running shorts
Waistband construction and length is one of the biggest factors in whether shorts stay put during a long run.
Sizing running shorts can be a bit trickier than just going with your regular pants or bottom size that you’d wear for everyday clothing or a hike. Make sure to check the size chart for waist and hip measurements. With the tighter compression shorts style, sometimes the thighs can feel slightly tight, but there is usually no gaping at the back waistband. For loose shorts, especially if you have a smaller waist, look for options that have a drawstring.
When it comes to chafing or thighs rubbing together, it depends entirely on our body type. My legs have always rubbed together, and so I have to wear bottoms with at least a 5-inch inseam. If you don’t chafe, wear whatever type of shorts you prefer. If you often chafe, opt for a tight-fitting pair of shorts with a longer inseam and grippy leg seams. Chafing is body-specific—what works for one runner may not work for another. Some people are also more prone to chafing only with certain materials, or only if they are sweating.
Brands like Nike, Janji, Oiselle, and Gnara offer the most inclusive sizing.
Women’s running shorts care and maintenance tips
Most women's running shorts are machine washable. For best results, turn them inside out to protect any liners and the main fabric.
Wash in cold water and hang to dry, as heat degrades or warps the elastic in waistbands and other compression garments over time.
Never use fabric softener on technical fabrics. It coats moisture-wicking fibers, which reduces performance in the field.
Typically, a liner’s life is shorter than the outer shell. If the liner does wear out first, note that some brands offer liner replacement or repair programs, like Patagonia and Janji.
Synthetic fabrics can hold odor over time, so if your shorts are starting to smell rank all the time, try using a sport wash (like Nikwax Tech Wash) or pre-soak in a diluted white vinegar solution before washing.
FAQ
-
The inseam length best for running shorts depends on personal preference and body anatomy, but many runners prefer an inseam long enough that their legs won’t rub together and chafe. However, other runners prefer short split shorts or racing buns. As long as you’re comfortable, you can wear whatever inseam length you like.
-
Running shorts with a liner aren’t necessary, but can be nice if it’s extremely hot out and you want to feel like you aren’t wearing anything. A built-in liner also eliminates the need for an additional layer of underwear, which could lead to chafing.
-
The difference between road running and trail running shorts centers around the number of pockets as well as durability. Road running shorts often have fewer pockets than trail running shorts and may use less durable fabric. Trail running shorts will have more pockets for potentially longer runs, where storage needs are greater, and will be made from more abrasion-resistant fabrics to withstand falls or brushing against rocks or trees.
-
The difference between running, track-style shorts, and compression shorts is the overall fit and looseness of the leg openings. Running shorts are looser around the butt and thighs, with 2 to 5-inch inseams and more breathability. Compression shorts (or fitted shorts) are tight-fitting with no loose fabric. The compression-style shorts will often have 5-inch or longer inseams and more usable pockets than loose-style running shorts.
-
Running shorts ride up if they don’t fit properly. Riding up could be because the inseam is too short for the shape of your thighs and butt, and thus can’t stay down. Alternatively, if the leg openings aren’t tight enough on a pair of fitted shorts (or don’t have the silicone grips on the inside that ideal running shorts do), they can easily roll or ride up. Or, it could be the wrong size (or you are in between sizes).
-
You can run in biker shorts (sometimes called fitted or compression shorts) instead of traditional running shorts. It’s all down to preference and comfort—whatever gets you logging those miles and enjoying the run.
-
To keep your phone in your shorts without it bouncing, compression or fitted shorts are your best bet. These will have flat drop-in pockets on the outside of the thighs that you can easily slide your phone into, and because these pockets are also tight, you’ll get no bouncing and a secure fit.
-
The difference between 2-in-1 running shorts and shorts worn over tights is that 2-in-1 running shorts are stitched together into a single garment. That way, you only have one waistband instead of layering them, which can be very cumbersome on a run.
-
To keep your waistband from rolling down during a run, make sure the waistband fits properly (aim for drawstring shorts if the waistband is often loose). You can also look for high-waisted shorts (both loose and compression) that are high enough to avoid rolling down during a run.
-
You can wear running shorts on a trail run. Classic running shorts will not have as many pockets as trail running shorts, but if you need to carry water, fuel, and the like, check out our guide to the best hydration vests.
-
Running shorts should fit tight enough that they aren’t falling down at the waist, but loose enough in the legs that movement is restricted. The inseam length, combined with your body shape, will determine whether you chafe. If you do typically chafe, choose a longer inseam, like 7 or 9 inches.
How we researched and tested
We tested across road runs, trails, track workouts, and long training days.
We tested 16 pairs of shorts with varying styles, like loose and unlined, loose and lined, and many tight-fitting compression shorts. Some we have been testing for at least two years, while others we tested over a matter of weeks to months in the spring and early summer. Each pair was tested side-by-side in its specific category. We looked at shorts that we always see worn in our local running groups, while also reviewing and testing what is new online.
For ranking and winners, we considered the number of features (like how many pockets and what type), as well as types of seam construction, fabric and materials quality, and if the waistband rolled down or the leg openings rolled up. We noted if our phone (iPhone 16 with an Otterbox cover and PopSocket) could fit in all the pockets or just some, if it was easy to get out mid-run, and if it bounced around too much. We also looked at how inclusive sizing is, and if sizes were just scaled up or truly cut differently to fit larger or smaller bodies.
For each pair, we wore them on multiple runs with varying paces for each. Some runs were more than 5 or 10 miles at an easier pace, while other runs were 3 miles at a faster pace. We wore these on flat ground, hills, and even a few rocky trails, and in cooler, 50-degree sunny weather as well as 75-degree, hot weather.
I tested all of the shorts, while other testers ran in some of them. I have a mid-size body with a curvy butt and thighs (often wearing a size medium or 6), while the other testers have more athletic body types with slightly less curves, in sizes small/medium and 4/6. We also spoke to other runners to get their insight on why they prefer one type of short over another, and what features they have to have in their go-to road running shorts.
We washed all of them on a regular cycle at least two times and let them air dry to see how the construction and any compression held up.
- Easy-pace long runs of 5–10+ miles
- Faster-pace runs of 3 miles & speed work
- Flat ground, hills & rocky trails
- Tested across curvy mid-size & athletic body types
- All pairs machine washed at least twice & air dried
- Chafe prevention at inner thigh, liner & waistband
- Waistband roll-down & leg opening ride-up
- Pocket security with iPhone 16 + OtterBox + PopSocket
- Phone bounce during running
- Compression retention after washing
Why you should trust us / About the author
Based in Boulder, Colorado, Mattie specializes in writing about outdoor adventures, gear, travel, fitness, health, and education/parenting, with more than 10 years of experience. Her areas of expertise include trail running, camping, backpacking, snowboarding, and hiking.
Mattie's favorite part of living in Boulder is the easy access to so many trails to enjoy—whether that’s hiking, trail running, or road running, she gets outside by any means with her dog, Imogene. Every summer, she trains for some sort of trail race in Colorado; in past years, she has run the Imogene Pass Run in Ouray, the West Line Winder in Buena Vista, and the Crested Butte Ultra. You can read more of Mattie’s work at her website or on her author page.
